April 29, 2007
BAD SEOS BEWARE – Google personalized is here!
As an SEO, I am constantly trying to dispel search myths and misconceptions to the best of my little ability. I also try to get people to evaluate SEO campaigns and companies in the right light. Like any other direct marketing channel, they should be evaluated on ROI. I have always thought that SEO should be evaluated not on rankings or traffic but on sales that result from the effort.
Google personalized search should change the way many companies evaluate SEO firms, which has often been by rankings. Many of us know that clients love to type in a few words and see rankings like they were the stock market. Now, can you imagine if the stock market gave different pricing based on who is asking for the price? Well, that just wouldn’t work. In search, it totally works, as a search engine attempts to give the searcher the most relevant result possible. Take this example:
Suppose you do a Google search on the term “seal.” How likely would you be to buy a CD from “Seal” if you were seeking:
• information on the mating patterns of seals
• a documentary on Navy seals
• the Easter Seals web site
• seals for a leaky roof.
Probably not very likely. Why? Because a CD from the artist “Seal” was not what you were looking for and these other results are not even closely related to music.
The odds of a sale/conversion are VERY slim.
If I am really into music, and I was to search for “seal” and then find results about the guy married to Heidi Klum (oh, and he’s an Grammy winning singer), I would have received relevant results for my search. On the other hand, if I am zoologist and find him, I may not have gotten a relevant result as I may have been looking for results about the animal.
Personalized search seeks to address this issue, and its impact has many SEO companies concerned, but they shouldn’t be.
They usually evaluate success on traffic / leads / sales / e-newsletter signups and other measures that show VALUE. Ranking well for a term that leads people to “seals” (the animal) or Navy seals who were really seeking “Seal” of Grammy fame is NOT going to lead to the desired result. Amazon’s CD store, the iTunes store, or a documentary on Navy seals should not show up in the results for someone looking for information on the animal. That is not going to be a very valuable click either.
Here’s why — good SEO firms know that a client who obsesses over rankings is not focusing on what matters most to a business. A good client obsesses over results and revenues. They don’t care as much if they search for a term and see it at 15, and I see it at 7.
We’ll never know where each term ranks for each person performing a search. So, what is the next best metric? At the least, it should traffic but ideally it should be leads / sales / revenues.
As a frequent searcher myself, anything Google does to make my search experience more relevant to me is a good thing for EVERYONE!
Yahoo is rolling out personalized search too, see info here or here. This is a coming trend, so SEO firms take notice. Your days of analyzing success based on where your client ranks as the MAIN form of analysis are limited. And thank GOD!!!!
4 COMMENTS
-
jody says:
April 30, 2007 @ 2:37 pmGood point, Wil, but if high rankings will lead to success measures like traffic & sales, it would only make sense to include rankings in your success metrics. i.e. if you hit a triple playing baseball, then your odds of scoring are greater than if you hit a single. Success isn’t always just about homeruns here.
-
wil says:
May 14, 2007 @ 9:52 amAgreed Jody, 100%, people like you and I know that high rankings usually leads to traffic and sales, but that is predicated on the fact that you are targeting the RIGHT keywords that connect with users searches.
Thanks for dropping by
-
Is Google Ready to Become the Ultimate Super Affiliate? says:
May 25, 2007 @ 11:28 am[...] Can we do some things to be able to target the prospects group even better? Yes, we can manipulate… ehh, sorry, Personify the search results to fit the users profile even better and then bring better targeted offers! (Ps. a good explanation of these Personalized Search effects can be read at Thinkseer ) [...]
-
Bad SEOs Beware - Google Personalized is here! at i-advertising says:
August 7, 2007 @ 5:36 pm[...] Probably not very likely. Why? Because a CD from the artist “Seal†was not what you were looking for and these other results are not even closely related to music. The odds of a sale/conversion are VERY slim. ——> More Filed under News. | var blogTool = “WordPress”; var blogURL = “http://i-advertising.com”; var blogTitle = “i-advertising”; var postURL = “http://i-advertising.com/?p=20″; var postTitle = “Bad SEOs Beware – Google Personalized is here!”; var commentAuthorFieldName = “author”; var commentAuthorLoggedIn = false; var commentFormID = “commentform”; var commentTextFieldName = “comment”; var commentButtonName = “submit”; search [...]
SEARCH OUR BLOG:
RECENT POSTS:
- How to Increase Your PPC ROI w/ Modified Broad Match
- Take Advantage of Google Tag’s 30 Day Free Trial
- Stop Giving Away Your Twitter Traffic in Google Analytics!
- How are they beating you? Quick SEO Analysis Tools – Part 1
- Sitelinks: What Can They Do For Your Metrics?
- Detect Hacking attempts with Google Analytics
- The 17 commandments of setting expectations in SEO (interview)
- Bing Updates Webmaster Tools for the Worse
- Are Seller Rating Extensions A 5-Star Feature?
- 5 Traits of Successful Internet Marketers
CATEGORIES:
ARCHIVES:
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006