<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Seer Interactive SEO Blog &#187; Crystal Anderson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/author/crystal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seerinteractive.com</link>
	<description>SEO SEM and the world of search marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:49:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How to Use PPC to Help Build a Confident SEO Campaign</title>
		<link>http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/how-to-use-ppc-to-help-build-a-confident-seo-campaign/2010/02/24/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/how-to-use-ppc-to-help-build-a-confident-seo-campaign/2010/02/24/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crystal Anderson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seerinteractive.com/?p=849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being a company that focuses solely on SEO and PPC (along with Google Analytics to measure and analyze performance), we are often faced early on in potential client conversations with the million-dollar question: Should I focus my online efforts on SEO or PPC? Depending on the potential client’s goals, business model, etc., the conversation may ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a company that focuses solely on SEO and PPC (along with Google Analytics to measure and analyze performance), we are often faced early on in potential client conversations with the million-dollar question: <strong>Should I focus my online efforts on SEO or PPC? </strong>Depending on the potential client’s goals, business model, etc., the conversation may get even trickier &#8211; changing direction from SEO to PPC or from PPC to SEO, or sometimes even from SEO and PPC to a completely different avenue of marketing.</p>
<p>The great thing when you are dealing with a company that does solely focus on SEO or PPC (at least in the case of SEER), is that we are committed to pointing potential clients in the right direction (<em>the one that gives them RESULTS)</em>, whether that is focusing on SEO or PPC (with SEER or without), or another means of advertising outside of SEER. It’s certainly a tough call, but when you’re in the trenches of search day in and day out you know what type of clients will and will not succeed and let’s be honest, who wants to take a project on that you have that “gut” feeling from the start may fail? (Check out one of Wil&#8217;s latest posts for more on <a href="http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/avoiding-client-seo-failures-our-near-huge-mistake/2010/02/15/"><em>Avoiding Client SEO Failures</em></a>)</p>
<p>So, how do you convince a client who is dead set on an SEO Campaign that, at this moment, PPC is their best approach? </p>
<p><span style="font-size: 150%;"><strong>Communicate you are PROTECTING their downside!</strong></span></p>
<p>Often times when a client is approaching you for an SEO campaign, the thought of engaging in PPC instead scares them. </p>
<p>From a financial standpoint, investing in an SEO may <em>seem</em> like a better solution for a potential new client; they look at SEO as a 12-month investment that they no longer pay for after the contract expires but continue to reap the benefits from.</p>
<p>And at initial glance, PPC appears to have a higher <strong>ONGOING</strong> price tag – there is the ad-spend, the agency management fee, potentially a setup fee, landing page development fees, etc. </p>
<p>However, what happens if you are dealing with a company who has <strong>ZERO</strong> online presence or better yet, one that is introducing a new product/service?  </p>
<p>If you are anything like the SEER team, taking a <em>(educated)</em> guess that you are choosing the correct terms to optimize a site around based solely on volume, relevancy, etc.for a brand new business/product/service does <strong>NOT</strong> sound like a good idea .  </p>
<p>Why? Because what happens when you get your client all page one rankings and the conversions <strong>DON’T COME IN</strong>? </p>
<p>Well, here’s the other million dollar question that now your client will be asking YOU: <span style="font-size: 175%;"><strong>Where are the customers?</strong></span></p>
<p><img src="https://seerinteractive.box.net/shared/static/x32op5cf88.jpg" alt="Empty Store" /></p>
<p>So, to avoid the <em>“Where are the customers” </em>question, turn the tables on the client in the discovery stage and <strong>push</strong> them down the PPC path (But again, do so by communicating you are PROTECTING their downside!). </p>
<p><span style="font-size: 175%;"><strong>Use PPC to TEST what terms ACTUALLY do drive the conversions!</strong></span></p>
<p>And don’t just test the terms haphazardly – <strong>Structure your PPC account in the same way you would be driving organic traffic to the clients’ site. </strong></p>
<p>1. Set up a unique Campaign for every page you will likely target in your SEO campaign. </p>
<p>2. Your ad groups will then house the terms you will target to each unique page. </p>
<p>3. Your “landing pages” should be the actual page on the site that you would optimize the targeted terms for. </p>
<p>4. Finally, ensure your campaign settings best match an “SEO” campaign.  For instance, target the US (assuming that is your market); target Google Search only (vs. Google Search &#038; Search Partners), etc. </p>
<p>Granted, there will be uncontrollable variances to how organic and paid traffic perform; however, wouldn’t it be great to gather statistically significant data for a client on terms that are <strong>PROVEN</strong> to (or not to) work! Not to mention, imagine how much more at ease the client will be throughout the SEO campaign knowing that there they already generated some new customers through the PPC tests and are confident they will achieve the ROI from SEO they desire!</p>
<p>Once you have your statistically significant data to base your decision off of, you can then push forward with an SEO campaign that you have <strong>CONFIDENCE</strong> in will drive the results your client desires.  And as long as your PPC account is returning a positive ROI, you may have just helped a potential client grow their business exponentially just by doing some smart marketing research (and hey, picked up a PPC client for yourself!). </p>
<p>And if your statistically significant PPC data leads you to have the tough conversation with you potential client that <em>“this is not going to drive the results you need,”</em> don’t you think your potential client will thank you (and who knows, maybe even refer you to other potential clients) for not wasting their money OR time?</p>
<p>As my colleague Bonnie mentioned in a previous blog, <em><a href="http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/want-to-avoid-a-million-dollar-mistake/2009/05/15/">Want to Avoid a Million Dollar mistake</a></em>, use PPC for the benefits it brings – Do the research (fairly quickly) for your potential client before you waste their time (and yours) and money!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/how-to-use-ppc-to-help-build-a-confident-seo-campaign/2010/02/24/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 Simple Steps for PPC Ad Testing Strategy</title>
		<link>http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/5-simple-steps-for-ppc-ad-testing-strategy/2009/09/22/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/5-simple-steps-for-ppc-ad-testing-strategy/2009/09/22/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crystal Anderson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkseer.com/blog/5-simple-steps-for-ppc-ad-testing-strategy/2009/09/22/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ad Copy testing can seem like a daunting task, especially when your account has multiple campaigns/ad groups and runs across multiple platforms.  However, when you take a step back and really think about the goal behind Ad Copy testing, you start to see the light at the end of the tunnel.
Let&#8217;s start at Step ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ad Copy testing can seem like a daunting task, especially when your account has multiple campaigns/ad groups and runs across multiple platforms.  However, when you take a step back and really think about the goal behind Ad Copy testing, you start to see the light at the end of the tunnel.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s start at <strong>Step One:  Why do we run Ad Copy tests?</strong><br />
The answer is easy â€“ <strong>To find the optimal performing ads that drive the most conversions.</strong>  </p>
<p>While all PPC marketers <em>(I hope)</em> realize that this is the end goal in Ad Copy testing, many PPC marketers get overwhelmed with the amount of ads in their accounts and get caught up with where to start and how to achieve the goal.  It really does not need to be such a stressful task. </p>
<p>Though it would be great to be able to run ad copy tests across all campaigns/ad groups, the fact is there is just not enough time in the day to tackle it all. </p>
<p><strong>Simply (Step Two) start by identifying your under-performing campaigns/ad groups</strong> (I recommend using a 60-90 day time frame, though depending on the volume of your account, a 30 or even 120 day time frame may be more appropriate) that if you optimized ad copy, could have a positive impact in performance.  &#8220;Under-performing&#8221; can be various indicators, for example; over CPA/CPL /ROAS/ROI goals, low CTR, low conversions, etc.  </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s look at an example of how to choose your under-performing campaigns for your Ad Copy testing. Below I&#8217;ve indicated the three campaigns that within this data set, I would chose to focus on when looking to run an ad copy test. One has the lowest CTR, one has the highest CPA and the last has the lowest conversions.<br />
<img src="https://seerinteractive.box.net/shared/static/gtih135q3a.jpg" alt="screenshot5" /></p>
<p>Now that I know where I want to focus my time and energy to improve performance through testing Ad Copy, <strong>Step Three is pulling an Ad Report for those campaigns</strong> (use the same time frame as you did when selecting under-performing campaigns).  </p>
<p>Sort &#038; filter the report by Campaign/Ad group. From there, create a new column with the formula<strong> CTR * Conversion Rate</strong>. By using this formula, you are not just analyzing ads based on CTR, which is <strong>not</strong> an indicator of conversions, or Conversion Rate, which is <strong>not</strong> an indicator of traffic. You are able to find the <strong>optimal pairing</strong> of CTR (the traffic indicator) and Conversion Rate (the conversion indicator). The one important thing to keep in mind with this formula is that it won&#8217;t work for evaluating all of your ads, namely those that have low/no conversions. In that instance, you would simply base your decisions off of CTR. </p>
<p>Once you have the new formula calculated for all ads,<strong> Step Four is ensuring there is statistical significance between ads</strong>. Here at SEER, we have an amazing developer, who has built us a proprietary internal tool to automatically determine statistical significance between the formula, CTR * Conversion Rate  (screen shot below).<br />
<img src="https://seerinteractive.box.net/shared/static/5p01l2mckt.jpg" alt="screenshot2" /></p>
<p>If you aren&#8217;t as lucky as we are, there are various Stat Checker tools out there you can use for the same thing. A few of our favorites are: <a href="http://www.splittester.com/index.php">Split Tester</a>, <a href=" http://tools.seobook.com/ppc-tools/calculators/split-test.html">SEO Book Split Tester</a> and  <a href="http://www.supersplittester.com/">Super Split Tester</a> . While you may not be able to check the statistical significance of the formula by itself, you can still use it to check Clicks/CTR or Conversions/Conversion rate to ensure the outcome of the formula is based on statistical significance. </p>
<p><strong>95%</strong> is the ideal confidence level you want to reach to make a decision on the &#8220;winning ad.&#8221; However, if you find the ads consistently run at an 85-90% confidence level, it may indicate that the ads are very similar and thus will continue to perform in that manner, which indicates a new ad test is still ideal. </p>
<p>Now that you have your statistically significant winner in each ad group, you can confidentially <strong>pause the under-performing ad, and replace it with a new ad to test against the winner (Step Five)</strong>. However, in order to ensure you are running a well structured ad test, it is critical to remember to <strong>isolate the ad test to one variable</strong>. For instance, when writing your new ad, keep all copy consistent with the winning ad, with the exception of 1 variable, perhaps the headline, value proposition, call to action, or even display variable.  Here is an example of two ads that would adhere to ideal ad testing practices:<br />
<img src="https://seerinteractive.box.net/shared/static/19gdvdora1.jpg" alt="screenshot3" /><br />
<img src="https://seerinteractive.box.net/shared/static/j17bp4ge9y.jpg" alt="screenshot4" /></p>
<p>Notice the <strong>only</strong> variable I changed was the value proposition in Line 2 -> Free Shipping vs. Price Point. Testing just one variable at a time allows you to easily determine and understand why the ads are performing differently. </p>
<p>One of the best things about optimizing your ads and testing them using this strategy is you are able to get into a rotation. When your first test (let&#8217;s say the one in Step Two) is implemented and aggregating data, you can start the process all over again with a new round of campaigns to optimize and test new ads. If your first test was to optimize and test ads for under-performing campaigns, perhaps in round two of testing you should tackle your top converting campaigns, as you can always improve performance by tweaking aspects of your campaigns! </p>
<p>So, any time you want to optimize and test your ads follow the five simple steps for a stress-free testing strategy!<br />
<strong>Step One:  Why do we run Ad Copy tests?<br />
Step Two: Identify your under-performing campaigns/ad groups (or other set of factors to test a specific set of ads)<br />
Step Three: Pull an Ad Report for those campaigns and add the CTR*Conversion Rate formula (where/when applicable)<br />
Step Four: Ensure there is statistical significance between ads<br />
Step Five: Pause the under-performing ad and replace it with a new ad to test against the winner (remembering to isolate just one variable for accurate testing)</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/5-simple-steps-for-ppc-ad-testing-strategy/2009/09/22/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo Makes My Blood Boil, What About You?</title>
		<link>http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/yahoo-makes-my-blood-boil-what-about-you/2009/05/18/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/yahoo-makes-my-blood-boil-what-about-you/2009/05/18/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 12:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crystal Anderson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkseer.com/blog/yahoo-makes-my-blood-boil-what-about-you/2009/05/18/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s often mumbles heard around PPC offices that &#8220;Yahoo !@#$%&#8221; (fill in the blank with whatever terms of endearment you&#8217;d like), followed by a &#8220;I wish it was like Google.&#8221; These are not harsh, unearned accusations toward Yahoo; They are simply the words of frustrations from kick !*@ PPC Managers who truly want to kill ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s often mumbles heard around PPC offices that &#8220;Yahoo !@#$%&#8221; (fill in the blank with whatever terms of endearment you&#8217;d like), followed by a &#8220;I wish it was like Google.&#8221; These are not harsh, unearned accusations toward Yahoo; They are simply the words of frustrations from kick !*@ PPC Managers who truly want to kill for their clients and who are wishing they could turn out ridiculous campaign metrics on Yahoo as they do on Google, and most importantly with the same ease.</p>
<p>The PPC Team at SEER is no different. The Yahoo-woos are often heard, and often heard multiple times a day around the office.  In the past the SEER PPC team has mentioned <a href="http://www.thinkseer.com/blog/a-new-ppc-can-of-worms-has-been-open-%E2%80%93-the-yahoo-search-query-report/2008/06/09">Yahoo Search Query reports</a> on our blog. Back then my colleague, Bonnie, was the only privileged PPC Manager at SEER to get her hands on those reports.  However, recently SEER landed a Yahoo Agency rep, who has truly been fantastic. One of the things she&#8217;s been able to do for us is to <strong>FINALLY</strong> provide all of our clients with the Search Query reports, on a monthly basis. (It seems that there are also other agencies out there that are finally gaining access to these reports as well according to a recent post on the<a href="http://www.ppchero.com/new-yahoo-search-query-expand-report-not-quite-up-to-par-with-google/"> PPC Hero blog</a>).</p>
<p>However, along with the pure excitement of getting our hands on these top secret reports, unfortunately the SEER team also came to realize that the great privilege to receiving these report also brings along a dark cloud.</p>
<p><strong>Why you ask? Let me tell youâ€¦.</strong></p>
<p>1. No matter how much you wish upon a star you cannot exclude <strong>&#8220;NOISE&#8221; </strong>words, <strong>Not <strong>EVER</strong>, No WAY!</strong></p>
<p>What are <strong>&#8220;noise&#8221;</strong> words you ask? Well unless you specifically reach out to Yahoo regarding one of these terms, this is also kept top secret by our beloved Yahoo.  &#8220;Noise&#8221; Terms are terms that are more commonly thought of as &#8220;articles.&#8221; This list includes the following terms:<br />
A<br />
About<br />
All<br />
An<br />
And<br />
Are<br />
At<br />
Be<br />
Do<br />
For<br />
How<br />
http<br />
is<br />
me<br />
my<br />
of<br />
on<br />
or<br />
out<br />
the<br />
to<br />
was<br />
what<br />
with<br />
you<br />
your</p>
<p><strong>How does this hurt your campaign performance you ask? Well, just to name a few:</strong></p>
<p>a. If you are offering a service, let&#8217;s say, <em>&#8220;hair styling&#8221;</em>, you obviously don&#8217;t want queries triggering your ad of users in a <em>&#8220;learning stage,&#8221;</em> such as <em>&#8220;how to style hair,&#8221;</em> <em>&#8220;about hair styling,&#8221;</em> etc. However, based on the list of terms above, both <em>&#8220;how&#8221;</em> and <em>&#8220;what&#8221; </em>are actually <strong>&#8220;noise&#8221;</strong> words, and you can&#8217;t stop your ads from showing? Absurd, I know!</p>
<p>b. How about if your company name is something like <em>&#8220;Wisdom Tree Landscaping.&#8221;</em> After receiving the almighty Search Query report, you realize you are showing up for <em>&#8220;Tree of Wisdom.&#8221;</em> Obviously not relevant, <strong>AT ALL</strong>. However, since <em>&#8220;of&#8221;</em> is a <strong>&#8220;noise&#8221;</strong> word, guess what, you cannot exclude this query!</p>
<p><strong>Blood boiling yet? Let me give you one more piece of infoâ€¦</strong></p>
<p>2. Now, Yahoo&#8217;s<em> &#8220;Standard&#8221;</em> Match is to be similar to Google&#8217;s <em>&#8220;Exact&#8221;</em> Match type.  Yahoo defines their <a href="http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/ysm/sps/articles/manage_keywords4.html?terms=standard+match">Standard Match Type</a> as:<br />
<em>The Standard match type displays your ads when a user searches for something online and you have already bid on the same keyword phrase. The Standard match type accounts for singular/plural variations and common misspellings.</em></p>
<p><strong>Sounds great right</strong>, Yahoo will catch all the one-offs you can&#8217;t think of off the top of your head.</p>
<p><strong>Actually, it&#8217;s not so great.</strong></p>
<p>Yahoo&#8217;s matching technology is certainly not up to par with Google&#8217;s. After receiving the Search Query report, it&#8217;s heart breaking to see how many queries trigger your Standard Terms.  </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a great example; for a client of mine I bid on a 2 term phrase, on Standard Match and it&#8217;s one of our highest converting terms. However, I found through Search Query reports, that I am actually being matched to a 12 term query, that does NOT relate to my term.  <strong>The kicker?</strong></p>
<p>Because this term is on Standard Match, I <strong>CANNOT</strong> add the 12 term query as a negative.  Yup, you heard right. On <a href="http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/ysm/sps/screenref/16485_adgroup.html?terms=excluded+words#6">Yahoo Negative terms</a> are not applied to campaigns/ad groups set to Standard Match. </p>
<p>So, now not only are your forced to show up for terms that include <strong> &#8220;Noise&#8221;</strong> terms, but also for any term Yahoo deems is a misspelling or singular/plural variation of your term. </p>
<p>The only <em>&#8220;quick&#8221;</em> fix you can implement if you see your Standard Match terms being matched to a <strong>TON</strong> of irrelevant queries is to change it to Advanced Match and then add the irrelevant queries. This then does open a whole other issue, as now your terms will be matched to all terms you were being matched to via Standard Match but now also queries that include pieces of your terms, your terms in different order, etc. (Here is more detail on <a href="http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/ysm/sps/articles/manage_keywords4.html?terms=excluded#advanced">Yahoo Advanced Match</a>. </p>
<p>No wonder Yahoo keeps the Search Query reports a secret! Even if you see the terms that you are being matched to that are not driving relevant traffic, in some instances, there is nothing that you can do about it!  Can you imagine what would happen if <strong>EVERY</strong> single Yahoo Advertiser was privy to these reports? Yahoo would receive a flood of angry emails!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/yahoo-makes-my-blood-boil-what-about-you/2009/05/18/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keyword insertion Gone Bad!</title>
		<link>http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/keyword-insertion-gone-bad/2009/01/16/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/keyword-insertion-gone-bad/2009/01/16/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crystal Anderson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkseer.com/blog/keyword-insertion-gone-bad/2009/01/16/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I literally just finished checking ad positioning for a PPC client of mine, on a new campaign we are testing around the topic of &#8220;scams.&#8221; No, we are not soliciting scams! Instead we realized that in our industry, as unfortunate as it is, there are a ton of scammers out there and therefore a ton ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I literally just finished checking ad positioning for a PPC client of mine, on a new campaign we are testing around the topic of &#8220;scams.&#8221; No, we are not soliciting scams! Instead we realized that in our industry, as unfortunate as it is, there are a ton of scammers out there and therefore a ton of buzz around companies (and therefore search queries) that are frauds, scams, etc. Instead of shying away from this, we wanted to take advantage of the search volume it brings (especially as few people will advertise here). Therefore the ads we are testing highlight our differences from the scammers â€“ Experience, Trusted Business, Money Back Guarantees, Rigorous Screen Processes, etc. </p>
<p><strong>Seems simple enough, right? WRONG. DEAD WRONG.</strong></p>
<p>Instead I found a terrible case of Keyword Insertion Gone Bad, and just had to rant a little! <em>From this first example, on the query &#8220;Psychic Scams,&#8221;</em> you&#8217;ll clearly see my case in point:<br />
<img src="http://www.box.net/shared/static/d75uu509gh.jpg" alt="scams" /></p>
<p>3 of the 5 ads are using Keyword Insertion â€“ Promoting &#8220;Psychic Scams&#8221; for their company. I have a funny feeling this is probably the <strong>OPPOSITE</strong> of what they were aiming to accomplish. At this point my mind began running â€“ this has to be a mistake, maybe just a coincidence. So, I began thinking of other industries where scams run rampant, hoping <strong>NOT</strong> to see this again <em>(It makes us PPC marketers look, well, just BAD!)</em>. Unfortunately, I found the same sickness occur again and again:</p>
<p>Example 2 &#8211; Query: Gold Scams<br />
<img src="http://www.box.net/shared/static/ixx4bn45js.jpg" alt="gold" /></p>
<p><em>Example 3 &#8211; Query: Car Scams</em><br />
<img src="http://www.box.net/shared/static/zmorruamu7.jpg" alt="car" /></p>
<p><em>Example 4 &#8211; Query: Dating Site Scams (Are you starting to see my point here?!?)</em><br />
<img src="http://www.box.net/shared/static/8aon67vu17.jpg" alt="dating" /></p>
<p><em>Example 5 &#8211; Query: Psychic Fraud</em><br />
<img src="http://www.box.net/shared/static/vkhzh52kx2.jpg" alt="fraud" /></p>
<p><em>Example 6 &#8211; Query: eBay Scams (Take notice to the similarities in the ad above in example 5)</em><br />
<img src="http://www.box.net/shared/static/xd8pj0g30k.jpg" alt="ebay" /></p>
<p><strong>I think by now you clearly see my point. I see some serious marketing dollars being wasted here!  </strong></p>
<p>While I am not frowning upon the use of Keyword Insertion in general, there is an absolute time and place to use it. In fact, smaller, niche ad groups tend to fair well using Keyword Insertion. When used correctly, you can certainly see a lift in your CTR and potentially in your quality score and conversion rate. However, it does require strict management and close monitoring. An article written by RedFlyMarketing (which highlights eBays horrendous use of Keyword Insertion) hits the nail on the head with the ins and outs of using <a href="http://www.redflymarketing.com/blog/dynamic-keyword-insertion-the-ultimate-guide/">&#8220;Keyword Insertion&#8221; </a>to your advantage. Additionally, if you are going to use Keyword Insertion, cover your bases and take another step &#8211; Be sure that your negative keyword list is built out to avoid any mishaps such as the ones above <em>(Please don&#8217;t contribute to making us PPC marketers look bad! )<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/keyword-insertion-gone-bad/2009/01/16/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 Reasons Why EVERYONE Should Love PPC</title>
		<link>http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/10-reasons-why-everyone-should-love-ppc/2008/04/21/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/10-reasons-why-everyone-should-love-ppc/2008/04/21/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crystal Anderson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkseer.com/blog/10-reasons-why-everyone-should-love-ppc/2008/04/21/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being a PPC marketer, I guess you could say I am a bit biased when it comes to thinking of reasons why everyone else should love PPC. It&#8217;s hard to imagine when you are entrenched in the industry, but those same simple reasons why we PPC marketers love the industry are not always so apparent ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a PPC marketer, I guess you could say I am a bit biased when it comes to thinking of reasons why everyone else should love PPC. It&#8217;s hard to imagine when you are entrenched in the industry, but those same simple reasons why we PPC marketers love the industry are not always so apparent to everyone else.  In fact, most times, they are not known at all. Inspired by my recent SES NY attendance, I quickly realized that the best part of actually sitting down to think about these reasons, is that I began to conceptualize that somehow not only have some of these reasons slipped by business owners <em>(read: potential clients)</em>, but have often times they&#8217;ve slipped by them because us <em>(PPC marketers)</em> often forget how important these reasons are to share with our <em>(potential)</em> clients.</p>
<p>Trying to narrow the list to just 10 was a bit difficult, but I was able to manage <em>(Again, I&#8217;m biased &#8211; I could probably create a never ending list)</em>.</p>
<p>1.  <strong>YOU</strong> have the Control â€“ There are very few mediums of marketing where you have <strong>COMPLETE</strong> control over your users.  PPC gives you the ability to choose your target audience, choose regions, choose the ads they see, choose what you are willing to pay to show your audience those ads, choose your budget limit, choose when you&#8217;d like your ads to show and the list goes on and on&#8230;.</p>
<p>2.You can take <strong>IMMEDIATE</strong> action â€“ Say you turn on an ad and it fails horribly. You are not bond by any out-clauses, contracts, etc. to keep that ad running and wasting your money. Simply <strong>TURN IT OFF</strong>. Not to mention, you can respond to offline events more quickly with PPC than with any other medium. <a target="_blank" title="This blog" href="http://www.thinkseer.com/blog/my-72-hours-of-sem-heaven-and-hell-how-to-use-ppc-to-capitalize-on-unexpected-offline-pr/2008/03/25/">This blog</a> written by my colleague is a perfect example of how you can capitalize on offline events.</p>
<p>3.You can test, <strong>EASILY</strong> and  <strong>QUICKLY</strong> â€“ There are unlimited possibilities when it comes to testing. Maybe you have new promotions you want to test, new ad copy, or new landing pages. Tools such as <a target="_blank" title="Google's Website Optimizer" href="https://www.google.com/accounts/ServiceLogin?service=websiteoptimizer&#038;hl=en&#038;continue=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fanalytics%2Fsiteopt%2F%3Fet%3Dreset%26hl%3Den&#038;utm_source=services&#038;utm_medium=redirect&#038;utm_campaign=standalone">Google&#8217;s Website Optimizer</a> allow you to quickly and efficiently run landing page tests (<strong>for FREE</strong>). In addition to the above testing options, you can <em>quickly test terms you may be considering to target with an SEO campaign</em>. If those terms aren&#8217;t driving conversions from PPC, you probably don&#8217;t want to spend the time or resources to launch an SEO campaign for those terms.</p>
<p>4.    Try <strong>NEW</strong> markets â€“ If you are launching your products in new markets, be it new countries, new age groups, etc. you can quickly test the success rate in those markets with PPC at a fraction of the cost, before launching a full blown marketing campaign.</p>
<p>5.    Run <strong>Promotions</strong> â€“ Have a last minute promotion? You can develop an ad and tweak your landing page within minutes to run new promotions. Not to mention you can use geo-targeting to tailor your promotions to specific regions if necessary.</p>
<p>6.    It&#8217;s <strong>COST EFFICIENT</strong> â€“ When you compare PPC to other advertising mediums, such as online banners, it is typical to see a much higher return on investment. Also for companies that may have a limited, you can run a very tightly targeted campaign. Whereas with online banners, geo-targeting actually drives your cost UP.</p>
<p>7.    It&#8217;s <strong>RESULTS DRIVEN</strong> <em>(not to mention you see results in (almost) real time)</em> â€“ You can easily track down to the exact conversion with PPC. If a certain campaign is not performing well, you have various choices to cut the inefficient spend. For example; reallocate your budget, try new landing pages, try new ad copy, etc. Real time reporting also allows you to see if campaigns are performing quickly. Those that are performing under metric can be identified within a few hours and turned off immediately.</p>
<p>8.    <strong>Content</strong> networks â€“ Coming from a media background, I know that top-quality media buys (banner advertising) can run a high tab. The Content networks offer you a relatively similar advertising experience for a much lower cost.</p>
<p>9.    You can easily <strong>EXPAND</strong> your business â€“ Companies now have the world at their fingertips and are able to reach markets with PPC that before may never have been possible due to the high cost to penetrate those markets.</p>
<p>10.    The market is <strong>CONTINUING TO GROW</strong> despite economic conditions â€“ When looking at at stats of Search Engine growth over the past few years, I am blown away with the continual upward growth we have seen and are continuing to see. The most surprising data is the prediction of continued advertising growth despite the economic downturn we are currently experiencing <em>(granted certain industries may be hit harder than others)</em>. I found some interesting research from <a target="_blank" title="Wall Street Journal" href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB120833235225819121-4N_o6bm8e2bsR8zWbri1XLsSS9A_20080517.html?mod=tff_main_tff_top">The Wall Street Journal</a> regarding this issue.</p>
<p>While this list can certainly be expanded, the above reasons can serve as a brief reminder for PPC marketers on why we should continue to stand behind, and promote our industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/10-reasons-why-everyone-should-love-ppc/2008/04/21/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advertisers beware &#8211; Big changes are coming in the PPC worldâ€¦</title>
		<link>http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/advertisers-beware-big-changes-are-coming-in-the-ppc-world%e2%80%a6/2008/03/21/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/advertisers-beware-big-changes-are-coming-in-the-ppc-world%e2%80%a6/2008/03/21/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crystal Anderson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkseer.com/blog/advertisers-beware-big-changes-are-coming-in-the-ppc-world%e2%80%a6/2008/03/21/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the online advertising world, updates, small tweaks, etc. are made to the search engines on a pretty regular basis without tremendous controversy. However, the past few weeks have tested advertisers&#8217; patience, as both Google and Yahoo! have announced some hefty upcoming changes that have caused a bit of a stir in the PPC world, ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma">In the online advertising world, updates, small tweaks, etc. are made to the search engines on a pretty regular basis without tremendous controversy. However, the past few weeks have tested advertisers&#8217; patience, as both Google and Yahoo! have announced some hefty upcoming changes that have caused a bit of a stir in the PPC world, as they may cause a significant negative impact across advertisers accounts.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma" /><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma">First, take a step back and ask yourself a few questions:</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma">1. Do you use redirects on your landing pages that slow down the user&#8217;s experience? 2. Are you operating off of a slow server?</span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma" /></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma"> If you answered yes to either of the above, the new addition to the <a title="Google Quality Score" href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2008/03/landing-page-load-time-will-soon-be.html">Google Quality Score</a> may have a negative impact on your account. Google has announced that within the next 2 weeks landing page load time will become a factor in determining the Quality Score. Google suggests that one of their motives behind this change comes from (1) data showing that users have the best experience when there is not a long time in between clicking an ad and getting to the landing page. Google plans to add this to the Keyword Analysis page shortly, giving advertisers with a bad review a month to improve page load time before slapping them with a lower quality score.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma">I, for one, am actually in favor of this change, especially from a consumer point of view. If I have to wait for a page to load, there&#8217;s a large chance I will abandon my search and try someone else (and probably one of your competitors). If you can&#8217;t serve me your landing page with the information I am seeking in a timely fashion, I cannot imagine what other obstacles I may face using your product/service.  This is exactly Google&#8217;s second (2) motive for adding the page load time to the QS. While I am sure Google will make an extra dollar off of this change by lowering QS and raising minimum bids for advertisers, advertisers on the other hand will get a bit of a wake up call and a slight insight as to why their conversion rates may be lower than expected. Should advertisers take Google&#8217;s expertise to heart and work to improve page load times, it may be a god-send in decreasing bounce rates, in turn improving conversion rates.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma"> </span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma">Now ask yourself the following:<br />
1. Are you bidding on terms that are not relevant to your business?<br />
2. Do you have well-structured ad groups around tightly themed keyword groups?<br />
3. Are you bidding on a keyword level to take advantage of lower bids for certain keywords (to offset higher bids on other keywords)?<br />
4. Are you utilizing keyword match type (broad, phase, exact and negative)?</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma"> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma">Depending on your answers above, the next <a title="big announcement from Yahoo!" href="http://www.ysmblog.com/blog/2008/02/26/minimum-bids/">big announcement from Yahoo!</a> (who is not only hanging on through the talks of being bought by Microsoft, but is taking even more steps to tailor their engine to mirror Google) may cause your minimum bids to increase <strong>OR</strong> decrease. Yahoo! has announced the change of their minimum bid function, which previously had been set at $0.10.  Now, they are moving more towards the &#8220;Google auction method&#8221;, taking into account factors such as quality of the keyword and value and are creating a bit of chaos in the PPC world as well.<br />
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma">As an advertiser, it&#8217;s important to closely monitor your minimum bids over the next few weeks as this update rolls out.  While some keywords may drop below the $0.10 bid, others may jump well above the $0.10, causing you to bid more for terms that previously you were able to get away with low bids on.</span><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma"><br />
</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma">To best prepare yourself for the update, I suggest putting yourself into the user&#8217;s mindset â€“ Are you offering the best user experience you can? Chances are, if you see flaws in the experience, they will too.</span></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/advertisers-beware-big-changes-are-coming-in-the-ppc-world%e2%80%a6/2008/03/21/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another new feature for Google Adwords advertisersâ€¦</title>
		<link>http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/another-new-feature-for-google-adwords-advertisers%e2%80%a6/2007/07/03/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/another-new-feature-for-google-adwords-advertisers%e2%80%a6/2007/07/03/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 16:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crystal Anderson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkseer.com/blog/another-new-feature-for-google-adwords-advertisers%e2%80%a6/2007/07/03/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the rollout of the Placement Platform, Google Adwords is again proving that they are extremely focused on being innovative in the ever-changing online advertising space.  The latest addition to Adwords advertising is the IP Exclusion Feature.  Adwords has taken things a step further with allowing advertisers to have control over their advertisements, ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Tahoma">After the rollout of the <a href="http://thinkseer.com/blog/take-advantage-of-a-good-thing-%e2%80%a6-adwords-placement-platform-launches/2007/06/14">Placement Platform</a>, Google Adwords is again proving that they are extremely focused on being innovative in the ever-changing online advertising space.  The latest addition to Adwords advertising is the IP Exclusion Feature.  Adwords has taken things a step further with allowing advertisers to have control over their advertisements, which is always a welcomed feature by the advertisers.  Advertisers have always had the ability to control placements of their ads in terms of choosing language settings, geo-targeting settings, site exclusion settings, etcetera however now with the addition of the new IP Exclusion feature advertisers also have the ability to<strong> specify IP addresses where they do not want their ads to show.</strong>  This is an amazing breakthrough in the online advertising world that will help to prevent  click fraud.  Advertisers however, should not get overly aggressive with implementing this new feature, as it may result in blocking a ton of relevant traffic.<br />
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Tahoma">As<a href="http://www.bizreport.com/2007/06/adwords_adds_ip_exclusion_feature.html"> BizReport </a>suggested, this feature may contribute in battling the click-fraud that advertisers face but usually do not have much control over.  Click-fraud can be identified when an ad is receiving an excessive amount of clicks from the same IP address on a continual basis.  </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Tahoma"> </span><br />
<strong><span style="font-family: Tahoma">2 Ways to effectively use the IP Exclusion Feature:</span></strong><span style="font-family: Tahoma"><br />
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-family: Tahoma">Blocking Competitor IP addresses</span></strong><br />
<span style="font-family: Tahoma">Blocking IP addresses from competitors could potentially aid in less click-fraud, which in turn may enhance the validity of reporting from Adwords by registering more of the quality clicks versus reports containing the fraud clicks and the quality clicks.<span /><br />
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-family: Tahoma">Fortune 1000 companies â€¦ Exclude yourselves</span></strong><br />
<span style="font-family: Tahoma">Blocking internal IP addresses could also aid in preventing the accidental clicks caused by employees and agencies constantly checking the status of their PPC ads.  We saw this happening firsthand with a client of ours.  They found that <strong>75% of their clicks on their branded keywords were from their own employees!  </strong>Another feature Adwords provides for checking Pay Per Click (PPC) ads for employees and agencies to carefully avoid the accidental clicking can be found <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=+&#038;adtest=on">here</a>.  </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Tahoma">The downside of IP exclusion is that if you block an IP address that uses a proxy, you may have succeeded in blocking the 1 or 2 people suspected of click fraud, but you may also be blocking hundreds and thousands of legitimate, quality clicks at the same time.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Tahoma">The <a href="https://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=61492&#038;query=IP+exclusion+&#038;topic=&#038;type=f&#038;onClick=">IP Exclusion Features</a> allows an advertiser to block up to 20 IP addresses per campaign. The IP Exclusion Feature can definitely serve as a benefit to Adwords campaign, but before you decide to enable the feature, be sure you have done your homework on the IP addresses you are about to block and the feature doesn&#8217;t backfire on you!</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Tahoma" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/another-new-feature-for-google-adwords-advertisers%e2%80%a6/2007/07/03/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Take advantage of a Good thing â€¦ Adwords Placement Platform launches</title>
		<link>http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/take-advantage-of-a-good-thing-%e2%80%a6-adwords-placement-platform-launches/2007/06/14/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/take-advantage-of-a-good-thing-%e2%80%a6-adwords-placement-platform-launches/2007/06/14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crystal Anderson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkseer.com/blog/take-advantage-of-a-good-thing-%e2%80%a6-adwords-placement-platform-launches/2007/06/14/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google&#8217;s phased launch of their Placement Platform may have all of us in the PPC world reevaluating our current stance on using Google&#8217;s content network.  Personally, it&#8217;s always been something I&#8217;ve shied away from.  I&#8217;ve heard and witnessed the PPC horror stories where an advertiser opts into the content network looking for some ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google&#8217;s phased launch of their <a href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2007/06/introducing-placement-performance.html">Placement Platform</a> may have all of us in the PPC world reevaluating our current stance on using Google&#8217;s content network.  Personally, it&#8217;s always been something I&#8217;ve shied away from.  I&#8217;ve heard and witnessed the PPC horror stories where an advertiser opts into the content network looking for some extra traffic, and wakes up with thousands of extra clicks, not to mention a spend that has flown through the roof (of course in some instances, this can be blamed on poor campaign management and all the blame cannot be placed on Adwords).</p>
<p>The content network allows sites to show ads on other sites that are not owned by Google, but using the Google platform.  For instance Marthastewart.com, NewYorkTimes.com, CBSsportsline.com, etc. allow you to advertise on their sites to their audience by setting up ads in <a href="https://adwords.google.com/select/afc.html">Google&#8217;s Content Network</a>.  The content network reaches users that by only advertising on the Google search network, you may otherwise not reach.  Until now, advertisers were not able to obtain site specific data, including conversion information, leaving advertisers in the dark as to which sites are performing for them, and therefore being completely unable to make appropriate decisions to increase the ROI on the content network.  Advertisers never could truly pinpoint what was or was not working for them; it was more or less a take all or leave all approach.</p>
<p>Why is this change important and a huge benefit for Adwords advertisers?  Now, as Adwords rolls out the new Placement Platform, advertisers will be able to identify exactly which sites are under performing and exclude their ads from running on those sites, as well as be able to determine which sites are driving conversions for them, and allocate more money to those specific sites only.  This will allow advertisers to have control of their ROI results on the content network.  That is not to say that the Placement Platform has alleviated the hard work behind running a successful Adwords campaign.  Similar to Google&#8217;s process of determining the minimum bid on the search network, taking into consideration keywords, landing pages, etc., the content network also evaluates the relevancy between your ad groups and the sites you are targeting to determine the minimum bids.  And of course, without a tightly structured campaign, your CTR and conversions will ultimately suffer.  Aaron at <a href="http://www.seobook.com/archives/002293.shtml">SEO book</a> offers some great ideas on how to use Google&#8217;s Content network beyond just the traditional sense of simply driving traffic to your site.  He suggests a few ways to maximize your profits and to use the content network and newly developed placement platform reports for competitive intelligence.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know an advertiser out there who isn&#8217;t willing to dump more money into campaigns that are driving sales.  The new changes on gathering data from ads running on the content network may entice advertisers who generally avoid running their ads on the content network, for reason of fear due to lack of data, to give it another try. The platform is yet to be unveiled to its full extent, however once it is available to advertisers and the proof in the data starts to show, I will be more than willing to reevaluate using the content network across all campaigns.  The new changes may make it worthwhile to give it another go, if it could increase my ROI, why not?</p>
<p>Any thoughts on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seerinteractive.com/blog/take-advantage-of-a-good-thing-%e2%80%a6-adwords-placement-platform-launches/2007/06/14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
