August 22, 2008
A Link Request Debate
One of the things that makes SEO so fun is that there is sometimes no definitively right or wrong way to do things. There are few things that I enjoy more than a good debate with the team about the pros and cons of different strategies. Coming up with strategies to drive high-quality, long-term valuable links for our clients is one of our current areas of focus.
A little while ago, I ran across a site that, on its blog, asked people for a link in exchange for a $5 gift card. The blog would also link back to anyone who linked to them (can you say reciprocal link?). This immediately sparked debate internally. Some thought it was very smart – it was argued that the site is simply asking people who enjoy its services to link to them. I agree; I think it is a smart idea to get people who like your company to link to your site. However, I argued that there were some flaws in the execution.
I wouldn’t have made my request so public. Last year, Google started cracking down on paid links by asking people to report them. Honestly, if I was a competitor of this site and saw this, I think I’d consider reporting them. Whether this counts as “paid links” is sort of borderline, but when you’re in a competitive industry and someone isn’t playing by the rules, I’d let a third party (Google) decide.
To correct this, I’d take a much more “below-board” approach to this strategy. I wouldn’t put the linking request out there as a public post on my blog. I would recommend communicating with customers, communicating with Twitter followers, messaging people in Facebook, etc. The strategies that I would employ are ones like this. Sure, a competitor might catch wind of it and still report you, but at least you’re minimizing your risk. Why not first try to get maximum value while minimizing risk? And if that strategy doesn’t work, then think about going public. But the risk is huge – if you are reported and Google decides that this is against its policies, you’re putting your site and your revenue at risk.
Still, it’s a very grey area. What do you think? Would you consider this example link buying? How would you improve upon their strategy? Let the debate continue.
3 COMMENTS
-
Brian Chappell says:
August 22, 2008 @ 4:13 pmIf you are too successful with your tactics, if you are in a heavily competitive niche, you always run the risk. Google makes up the rules as they go along.
Today they mean one thing, tomorrow another.
I like the email idea though.
-
dwight miller says:
August 26, 2008 @ 11:35 amI like the asking idea and while I know Google cracks down on paid links, I don’t see a problem with asking for a link and sending a gift as a thank you (the gift can also be a link). Can’t possibly see how Google would be upset with that strategy. As usual will interesting post
-
Laura says:
August 26, 2008 @ 4:07 pmThanks for the feedback, Brian & Dwight.
@Brian — I agree; all the engines can definitely keep you on your toes. There are many days where we’re left scratching our heads saying, “Why is that like that?” or “How did that happen?” It can be crazy but that’s often half the fun!
SEARCH OUR BLOG:
RECENT POSTS:
- ADAPT for SEO Success in Our Constantly Changing World
- 3 Easy Steps to Analyze the Impact of Universal Search
- Ten Wishes for the Yahoo & Microsoft Search Alliance
- Why a Link from The New York Times Doesn’t Matter
- How to Use PPC to Help Build a Confident SEO Campaign
- Quality Link Building starts with questions
- Avoiding Client SEO Failures – our near huge mistake
- Keyword Tool Discrepancies – How Broad Match Affects Trend Lines
- Google Alters Results & Does Not Trust You
- Top 10 Most Common PPC Mistakes
CATEGORIES:
ARCHIVES:
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006